Making a prequel to a highly successful series of films is not easy. Just watch Star Wars: The Phantom Menace. The temptation is always there to reverse engineer the prequel(s) so that they lead neatly up to the first, famous film. So, episodes 2 and 3 of the Star Wars prequels worked better because viewers could see where they were heading towards.

The original Alien from 1979, directed by Ridley Scott had big unanswered questions – who were the Aliens, where did they come from and why were they so sociopathic? Wisely, instead of directly answering these questions by setting the scene on the planetoid where the unfortunate crew of the Nostromo found the Alien in the first film, Scott took a different path.

Prometheus is set in the near future towards the end of this century. A team of archaeologists find cave paintings around the world from unconnected populations of prehistoric man all showing detailed star maps pointing to a moon in a distant solar system which could not have been observed by the painters. Dr Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace), one of the archaeologists, along with her partner Dr Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green) persuade the elderly billionaire Peter Weyland (Guy Pearce) to fund an expedition to this moon to test their hypothesis that this must be the origin of human life on Earth.

I won’t spoil the actual plot by revealing any further details, but in general terms it follows the same arc as Alien and Aliens – corporate backed expedition finds aliens, crew of expedition has range of competing motivations and a degree of mutual distrust and antagonism (particularly in respect of the token android), crew gets picked off by aliens, crew realises pathological nature of aliens and takes all necessary measures to try to prevent aliens from getting to Earth.

What the film does brilliantly is to take this formula and make an original and surprising story from it. While there is no definitive answer to any of the unanswered questions from Alien you can start to form plausible hypotheses as some of the characters in the film attempt to do. The third film in the original franchise left me cold and I didn’t bother with the fourth so I was partly expecting Prometheus to be more of the same and was “pleased” to find that it was actually rather unsettling overall, even if there were few scenes which were a real surprise (of course the geeky scientists who get cut off from the rest of the crew by a storm are going to meet a horrible end etc etc).

Partly this might be due to the film returning to the sparseness and claustrophobia of Alien and Aliens. Another element to it is, I think, that the action is plausibly brought to near our time. The clothes worn by the archaeologists on their expedition on Earth aren’t futuristic and, apart from the obvious technological advance enabling the starship Prometheus to travel at something approaching the speed of light, the technologies adopted aren’t unimaginable. By being set in the near future, the search for the origin of human life as a motive for the expedition is closer to the rhetoric of SETI and contemporary space exploration, whereas the more distant futures of the other films are ones where the commercial exploitation of space is an unremarked upon commonplace.

The film is not perfect – rather too much use is made of holographic projections of The Engineers (Shaw and Holloway’s name for the aliens who they hypothesised created humans) in their installation, showing them trying to flee from the Aliens and showing how to operate their technology. It isn’t clear why The Engineers would leave such useful visual aids for anyone. But this is a minor quibble. A definite recommendation for you this weekend if you’re planning on a trip to the cinema.


2 thoughts on “Prometheus

  1. I just came back from watching this movie. There have been mixed reviews over it – some people said it was terrible, some said it was good, etc., etc., I actually thought it was pretty good.

    I don’t know why Alien had to have an origin story though….but oh well…Prometheus was entertaining enough.

  2. Thanks for your comment.

    I think wanting answers is a natural thing – good films (even or rather particularly when they haven’t been expressly written to lead to a sequel) leave you curious about what happened next. If they don’t it is often because the characters have been drawn too poorly for you to care rather than because the film has been so expertly made as to make the rest mere trivia.

    Wanting to go back to before the film is part of this I think. That doesn’t mean that you need to go there in a prequel – at the risk of putting in a second Douglas Adams allusion in one piece, being really interested in the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe and everything might just give you the number 42. Prometheus leaves enough of the answer opaque and raises enough further questions to avoid that fate!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s